Having some problems with Safari 4.05 though: sometimes when the page loads the pagination is pushed down the page. It appears that the pagination is pushed down by the depth*amount of list elements. If the pagination is set to false there is still a large gap displayed sometimes below the slideshow.

Any advice?

PS Firefox 3.6.2 seems to work fine for me.

Thanks for your job.

Enfin un bon slide show léger et puissant, mais une fonctionnalité qui m’est cher à l’air de manquer, est il prévu d’implémenter dans la version pro un paramètre pour le nombre de li à afficher par slide ?

C’est bidouillable dans le code en mettant mes x éléments dans un seul mais je paierai volontier 5e pour du code propre :)

Merci !

I’m implementing horinaja on my website, thank you for the great work.

However I have a small suggestion, it’s to remove the inline style in the pagination links.

For my need for example, I don’t want pagination in the middle of the screen, separed by the same width. I want to put pagination link on the bottom left of my slideshow which is impossible ATM without hacking the javascript file to remove the inline width.

I know that if you want to put the pagination like that, you have to know the container width and so, do that using javascript. So, at least, add an option (boolean true or false) to add that width to pagination or not.

Regards,

zmove

Currently I have create the three Horinaja objects approximately one second apart, with their period set to 3 seconds:

new Horinaja('foo1',.25,3,true,false,0);
setTimeout(function() {new Horinaja('foo2',.25,3,true,false,0);},1000);
setTimeout(function() {new Horinaja('foo3',.25,3,true,false,0);},2000);

But due to the time required to execute the initialize() and start() methods, various things they may or may not start as desired. If it were possible to either do all the DOM manipulation but not start the animation immediately or to do all the DOM manipulation and then register an initial delay before the animation were to start, that would allow these to be started in a more synchronous manner…
…I’d rather not start making too many changes to your library as that would probably make upgrading to subsequent versions more difficult, so I figured I’d just live with my current solution and fire off a feature request to you :-)